[Design Ideas] ING, Gmail, Trip Advisor
March 1st, 2008 | Tags: contingency design, form validation, pagination, Pareto ruleIf you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Good design: ING registration form
We like the big obvious orange required field indicators, the real-time validation and the input formats on field focus. Very hard to make an error, attention to detail has made this a very efficient registration form.
Bad design: Gmail labels
What we dislike here is the ambiguity with labels. The user needs to understand that label colors can be changed by clicking on the light, barely-visible, gray squares. Names can be edited in 2 places but colors cannot be edited upon clicking “Edit Labels”. Designers should avoid in-between solutions. The functionality is either important enough to be part of the main interface or it is not; why hide something that was deemed important enough to be displayed up-front?
Interesting design: Trip Advisor pagination
We find the inconsistent pagination scheme (20 results on the first page, 50 on the following pages) on Trip Advisor interesting. We have a feeling that testing led to the realisation that shorter, less intimidating landing pages led to higher clickthrough rates… Just a hunch.




March 4th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
Very interesting. The ING direct is indeed very well designed.
Thank you.
June 27th, 2008 at 10:56 am
There needs to be some conformity and easy user navigation.