« Back to blog homepage
 

[Design Ideas] ING, Gmail, Trip Advisor

March 1st, 2008  |  Tags: , , ,

Good design: ING registration form

ING: Registration form
(Upon clicking “Enroll Now”)

We like the big obvious orange required field indicators, the real-time validation and the input formats on field focus. Very hard to make an error, attention to detail has made this a very efficient registration form.

Bad design: Gmail labels

Gmail: Labels
(Login required)

What we dislike here is the ambiguity with labels. The user needs to understand that label colors can be changed by clicking on the light, barely-visible, gray squares. Names can be edited in 2 places but colors cannot be edited upon clicking “Edit Labels”. Designers should avoid in-between solutions. The functionality is either important enough to be part of the main interface or it is not; why hide something that was deemed important enough to be displayed up-front?

Interesting design: Trip Advisor pagination

Trip Advisor: Paginaton

We find the inconsistent pagination scheme (20 results on the first page, 50 on the following pages) on Trip Advisor interesting. We have a feeling that testing led to the realisation that shorter, less intimidating landing pages led to higher clickthrough rates… Just a hunch.


2 Responses to “[Design Ideas] ING, Gmail, Trip Advisor”

  1. James C. Collins Says:

    Very interesting. The ING direct is indeed very well designed.

    Thank you.

  2. web design st george utah Says:

    There needs to be some conformity and easy user navigation.

Leave a Reply

* = Required fields